Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
The dominant issue was whether a stylus pen used with a digitizer screen is classifiable as an ADP machine unit under heading 8471. Applying Chapter Note 6(C), it was held that an X-Y coordinate input unit must be connectable to the CPU (through the digitizer) and capable of delivering data; the stylus pen satisfied these conditions as it interfaces via the screen and provides coordinate data. Technological advancement was treated as relevant to tariff interpretation, consistent with the principle against static construction of tariff terms, and a foreign ruling was considered only for persuasive value. The stylus pen was classified under sub-heading 84716090. - AAR
The dominant issue was whether a stylus pen used with a digitizer screen is classifiable as an ADP machine unit under heading 8471. Applying Chapter Note 6(C), it was held that an X-Y coordinate input unit must be connectable to the CPU (through the digitizer) and capable of delivering data; the stylus pen satisfied these conditions as it interfaces via the screen and provides coordinate data. Technological advancement was treated as relevant to tariff interpretation, consistent with the principle against static construction of tariff terms, and a foreign ruling was considered only for persuasive value. The stylus pen was classified under sub-heading 84716090. - AAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
