New 2025 Fourth Amendment tightens governance, executive roles and tech leadership for recognised stock exchanges, clearing corporations under 2018 Re...
The dominant issue was whether an appeal against rejection of a belatedly filed claim could yield any effective relief after approval of a resolution plan. The tribunal held that the claim was lodged beyond the prescribed submission date, was never admitted in the CIRP, and therefore did not form part of the approved resolution plan. Applying the principle that, upon plan approval, claims not included stand extinguished, and relying on precedent treating such post-approval challenges as infructuous, it concluded that no substantive relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. - NCLAT
The dominant issue was whether an appeal against rejection of a belatedly filed claim could yield any effective relief after approval of a resolution plan. The tribunal held that the claim was lodged beyond the prescribed submission date, was never admitted in the CIRP, and therefore did not form part of the approved resolution plan. Applying the principle that, upon plan approval, claims not included stand extinguished, and relying on precedent treating such post-approval challenges as infructuous, it concluded that no substantive relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
