Marketing support and subcontracted client contracts: no agency permanent establishment under Article 5 DTAA; arm's-length pricing bars profit attribu...
Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables include...
The dominant issue was whether an appeal against rejection of a belatedly filed claim could yield any effective relief after approval of a resolution plan. The tribunal held that the claim was lodged beyond the prescribed submission date, was never admitted in the CIRP, and therefore did not form part of the approved resolution plan. Applying the principle that, upon plan approval, claims not included stand extinguished, and relying on precedent treating such post-approval challenges as infructuous, it concluded that no substantive relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. - NCLAT
The dominant issue was whether an appeal against rejection of a belatedly filed claim could yield any effective relief after approval of a resolution plan. The tribunal held that the claim was lodged beyond the prescribed submission date, was never admitted in the CIRP, and therefore did not form part of the approved resolution plan. Applying the principle that, upon plan approval, claims not included stand extinguished, and relying on precedent treating such post-approval challenges as infructuous, it concluded that no substantive relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
