Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether an appeal against rejection of a belatedly filed claim could yield any effective relief after approval of a resolution plan. The tribunal held that the claim was lodged beyond the prescribed submission date, was never admitted in the CIRP, and therefore did not form part of the approved resolution plan. Applying the principle that, upon plan approval, claims not included stand extinguished, and relying on precedent treating such post-approval challenges as infructuous, it concluded that no substantive relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. - NCLAT
The dominant issue was whether an appeal against rejection of a belatedly filed claim could yield any effective relief after approval of a resolution plan. The tribunal held that the claim was lodged beyond the prescribed submission date, was never admitted in the CIRP, and therefore did not form part of the approved resolution plan. Applying the principle that, upon plan approval, claims not included stand extinguished, and relying on precedent treating such post-approval challenges as infructuous, it concluded that no substantive relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
