Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Refund was denied where goods were moved under an e-way bill containing an incorrect destination address, and the plea of inadvertent error was rejected. The court held that the taxpayer had adequate opportunity to seek correction, and unlike relied-on precedents, the consignor and consignee being the same negated the claim of a bona fide mistake. The court further found that repeated similar "address errors" could indicate a modus operandi, and the taxpayer produced no corroborative records (such as ledgers, books, or movement registers) to prove that the goods were actually meant for the stated warehouse. The writ petition was dismissed. - HC
Refund was denied where goods were moved under an e-way bill containing an incorrect destination address, and the plea of inadvertent error was rejected. The court held that the taxpayer had adequate opportunity to seek correction, and unlike relied-on precedents, the consignor and consignee being the same negated the claim of a bona fide mistake. The court further found that repeated similar "address errors" could indicate a modus operandi, and the taxpayer produced no corroborative records (such as ledgers, books, or movement registers) to prove that the goods were actually meant for the stated warehouse. The writ petition was dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
