Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classificatio...
Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Whether the foreign enterprise had a PE in India under Article 5...
Marketing support and subcontracted client contracts: no agency permanent establishment under Article 5 DTAA; arm's-length pricing bars profit attribution.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Whether the foreign enterprise had a PE in India under Article 5 of the India-USA DTAA and could be taxed by attributing income was decided against the Revenue. On facts, the Revenue failed to show furnishing of services in India or secondment of employees, and the Indian entity merely performed marketing/support with client contracts assigned/sub-contracted, without authority to conclude contracts or habitually secure orders for the foreign enterprise; customers were located outside India. Consequently, the conditions for an agency PE were not satisfied and no PE existed. In any event, applying the arm's length principle, where dealings are at ALP no further profit attribution arises. The appeals were dismissed for want of any substantial question of law - HC
Whether the foreign enterprise had a PE in India under Article 5 of the India-USA DTAA and could be taxed by attributing income was decided against the Revenue. On facts, the Revenue failed to show furnishing of services in India or secondment of employees, and the Indian entity merely performed marketing/support with client contracts assigned/sub-contracted, without authority to conclude contracts or habitually secure orders for the foreign enterprise; customers were located outside India. Consequently, the conditions for an agency PE were not satisfied and no PE existed. In any event, applying the arm's length principle, where dealings are at ALP no further profit attribution arises. The appeals were dismissed for want of any substantial question of law - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
