Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Transfer of assessment jurisdiction under Section 127 was challenged on the ground that the case should instead proceed at the original station and that incriminating material, if any, ought to have been routed there. The court held that Section 127 is a machinery provision enabling transfer for administrative convenience, coordinated investigation, efficient tax collection, and public interest, subject to prior reasonable opportunity and recorded reasons. As no mala fides were alleged, adequate hearing was granted, and the impugned order was a speaking order with acceptable reasons, the transfer was upheld and writ interference was declined. It was further held that Section 158BD does not bar centralization where linked entities are assessed elsewhere, if Section 127 procedure is followed. - HC
Transfer of assessment jurisdiction under Section 127 was challenged on the ground that the case should instead proceed at the original station and that incriminating material, if any, ought to have been routed there. The court held that Section 127 is a machinery provision enabling transfer for administrative convenience, coordinated investigation, efficient tax collection, and public interest, subject to prior reasonable opportunity and recorded reasons. As no mala fides were alleged, adequate hearing was granted, and the impugned order was a speaking order with acceptable reasons, the transfer was upheld and writ interference was declined. It was further held that Section 158BD does not bar centralization where linked entities are assessed elsewhere, if Section 127 procedure is followed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.