Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transfer of assessment jurisdiction under Section 127 was challenged on the ground that the case should instead proceed at the original station and that incriminating material, if any, ought to have been routed there. The court held that Section 127 is a machinery provision enabling transfer for administrative convenience, coordinated investigation, efficient tax collection, and public interest, subject to prior reasonable opportunity and recorded reasons. As no mala fides were alleged, adequate hearing was granted, and the impugned order was a speaking order with acceptable reasons, the transfer was upheld and writ interference was declined. It was further held that Section 158BD does not bar centralization where linked entities are assessed elsewhere, if Section 127 procedure is followed. - HC
Transfer of assessment jurisdiction under Section 127 was challenged on the ground that the case should instead proceed at the original station and that incriminating material, if any, ought to have been routed there. The court held that Section 127 is a machinery provision enabling transfer for administrative convenience, coordinated investigation, efficient tax collection, and public interest, subject to prior reasonable opportunity and recorded reasons. As no mala fides were alleged, adequate hearing was granted, and the impugned order was a speaking order with acceptable reasons, the transfer was upheld and writ interference was declined. It was further held that Section 158BD does not bar centralization where linked entities are assessed elsewhere, if Section 127 procedure is followed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
