Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Where the online return-filing utility prevented a claim of set-off under s.70(2), the Court held that assessees cannot be denied a lawful claim merely because the electronic utility does not permit the prescribed computation, consistent with prior binding precedents. It directed the tax administration to modify the utility to allow the assessee to first set off STCL (STT paid) against STCG (non-STT paid) and only thereafter against STCG (STT paid). Failing timely modification, the authority was ordered to accept and process the revised return for AY 2025-26 in paper form as a valid return under s.139(5), notwithstanding the statutory e-filing mandate. - HC
Where the online return-filing utility prevented a claim of set-off under s.70(2), the Court held that assessees cannot be denied a lawful claim merely because the electronic utility does not permit the prescribed computation, consistent with prior binding precedents. It directed the tax administration to modify the utility to allow the assessee to first set off STCL (STT paid) against STCG (non-STT paid) and only thereafter against STCG (STT paid). Failing timely modification, the authority was ordered to accept and process the revised return for AY 2025-26 in paper form as a valid return under s.139(5), notwithstanding the statutory e-filing mandate. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
