Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a limited scrutiny selected only to examine share premium, the AO made an addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit relating to share application money, thereby travelling beyond the permitted scope; the addition and consequential assessment were held unsustainable and the assessment was quashed as nullity. Separately, the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by one jurisdictional officer, but the assessment was completed by a different officer without a valid notice foundation; the assessment was held without jurisdiction and void ab initio, and was quashed. - ITAT
In a limited scrutiny selected only to examine share premium, the AO made an addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit relating to share application money, thereby travelling beyond the permitted scope; the addition and consequential assessment were held unsustainable and the assessment was quashed as nullity. Separately, the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by one jurisdictional officer, but the assessment was completed by a different officer without a valid notice foundation; the assessment was held without jurisdiction and void ab initio, and was quashed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
