Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
In a limited scrutiny selected only to examine share premium, the AO made an addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit relating to share application money, thereby travelling beyond the permitted scope; the addition and consequential assessment were held unsustainable and the assessment was quashed as nullity. Separately, the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by one jurisdictional officer, but the assessment was completed by a different officer without a valid notice foundation; the assessment was held without jurisdiction and void ab initio, and was quashed. - ITAT
In a limited scrutiny selected only to examine share premium, the AO made an addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit relating to share application money, thereby travelling beyond the permitted scope; the addition and consequential assessment were held unsustainable and the assessment was quashed as nullity. Separately, the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by one jurisdictional officer, but the assessment was completed by a different officer without a valid notice foundation; the assessment was held without jurisdiction and void ab initio, and was quashed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.