Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
In a limited scrutiny selected only to examine share premium, the AO made an addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit relating to share application money, thereby travelling beyond the permitted scope; the addition and consequential assessment were held unsustainable and the assessment was quashed as nullity. Separately, the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by one jurisdictional officer, but the assessment was completed by a different officer without a valid notice foundation; the assessment was held without jurisdiction and void ab initio, and was quashed. - ITAT
In a limited scrutiny selected only to examine share premium, the AO made an addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit relating to share application money, thereby travelling beyond the permitted scope; the addition and consequential assessment were held unsustainable and the assessment was quashed as nullity. Separately, the statutory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by one jurisdictional officer, but the assessment was completed by a different officer without a valid notice foundation; the assessment was held without jurisdiction and void ab initio, and was quashed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.