Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Salary received by a non-resident employee for services rendered entirely outside India was held not to accrue or arise in India under s. 5(2)(b). Applying the settled principle that salary accrues at the place where services are actually rendered, the forum found no material to show that any part of the employment duties corresponding to the impugned salary were performed in India, and it was undisputed that the employee worked in the Philippines during the relevant period. The employer's Indian status and disbursement of salary from India were held insufficient to shift the situs of accrual. Consequently, the foreign assignment salary was excluded from Indian taxation and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Salary received by a non-resident employee for services rendered entirely outside India was held not to accrue or arise in India under s. 5(2)(b). Applying the settled principle that salary accrues at the place where services are actually rendered, the forum found no material to show that any part of the employment duties corresponding to the impugned salary were performed in India, and it was undisputed that the employee worked in the Philippines during the relevant period. The employer's Indian status and disbursement of salary from India were held insufficient to shift the situs of accrual. Consequently, the foreign assignment salary was excluded from Indian taxation and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.