Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable...
Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables included.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable selection was held unsustainable where the TPO rejected four comparables proposed by the taxpayer without giving reasons, merely stating that the submissions were "not acceptable"; the AO/TPO was directed to include those four comparables in the final set. Working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO/DRP by relying on UN TP Manual/OECD guidelines and alleging lack of demonstration of impact; however, in view of Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) and binding precedent, the AO/TPO was directed to allow working capital adjustment while recomputing the adjustment, subject to the taxpayer furnishing requisite details, and the ground was allowed for statistical purposes - ITAT
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable selection was held unsustainable where the TPO rejected four comparables proposed by the taxpayer without giving reasons, merely stating that the submissions were "not acceptable"; the AO/TPO was directed to include those four comparables in the final set. Working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO/DRP by relying on UN TP Manual/OECD guidelines and alleging lack of demonstration of impact; however, in view of Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) and binding precedent, the AO/TPO was directed to allow working capital adjustment while recomputing the adjustment, subject to the taxpayer furnishing requisite details, and the ground was allowed for statistical purposes - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.