NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable...
Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables included.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable selection was held unsustainable where the TPO rejected four comparables proposed by the taxpayer without giving reasons, merely stating that the submissions were "not acceptable"; the AO/TPO was directed to include those four comparables in the final set. Working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO/DRP by relying on UN TP Manual/OECD guidelines and alleging lack of demonstration of impact; however, in view of Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) and binding precedent, the AO/TPO was directed to allow working capital adjustment while recomputing the adjustment, subject to the taxpayer furnishing requisite details, and the ground was allowed for statistical purposes - ITAT
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable selection was held unsustainable where the TPO rejected four comparables proposed by the taxpayer without giving reasons, merely stating that the submissions were "not acceptable"; the AO/TPO was directed to include those four comparables in the final set. Working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO/DRP by relying on UN TP Manual/OECD guidelines and alleging lack of demonstration of impact; however, in view of Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) and binding precedent, the AO/TPO was directed to allow working capital adjustment while recomputing the adjustment, subject to the taxpayer furnishing requisite details, and the ground was allowed for statistical purposes - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.