Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable...
Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables included.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable selection was held unsustainable where the TPO rejected four comparables proposed by the taxpayer without giving reasons, merely stating that the submissions were "not acceptable"; the AO/TPO was directed to include those four comparables in the final set. Working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO/DRP by relying on UN TP Manual/OECD guidelines and alleging lack of demonstration of impact; however, in view of Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) and binding precedent, the AO/TPO was directed to allow working capital adjustment while recomputing the adjustment, subject to the taxpayer furnishing requisite details, and the ground was allowed for statistical purposes - ITAT
Transfer pricing adjustment on the ground of comparable selection was held unsustainable where the TPO rejected four comparables proposed by the taxpayer without giving reasons, merely stating that the submissions were "not acceptable"; the AO/TPO was directed to include those four comparables in the final set. Working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO/DRP by relying on UN TP Manual/OECD guidelines and alleging lack of demonstration of impact; however, in view of Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) and binding precedent, the AO/TPO was directed to allow working capital adjustment while recomputing the adjustment, subject to the taxpayer furnishing requisite details, and the ground was allowed for statistical purposes - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.