Marketing support and subcontracted client contracts: no agency permanent establishment under Article 5 DTAA; arm's-length pricing bars profit attribu...
Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables include...
The dominant issue was whether the statutory pre-consultation process prescribed by CBIC Circular No. 1053/02/2017-CX is mandatory before issuance of show cause notices and adjudication, including cases invoking the extended period for alleged suppression or fraud. Relying on binding force of CBIC circulars and prior HC precedent, the Court held pre-consultation is not an empty formality and cannot be excluded merely because extended limitation is alleged, since such invocation depends on disputed factual determinations requiring evidence and hearing. Consequently, the impugned show cause notices and assessment/adjudication orders were quashed and the proceedings were revived from the pre-consultation stage - HC
The dominant issue was whether the statutory pre-consultation process prescribed by CBIC Circular No. 1053/02/2017-CX is mandatory before issuance of show cause notices and adjudication, including cases invoking the extended period for alleged suppression or fraud. Relying on binding force of CBIC circulars and prior HC precedent, the Court held pre-consultation is not an empty formality and cannot be excluded merely because extended limitation is alleged, since such invocation depends on disputed factual determinations requiring evidence and hearing. Consequently, the impugned show cause notices and assessment/adjudication orders were quashed and the proceedings were revived from the pre-consultation stage - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
