Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Whether disciplinary "other misconduct" under s.22 read with s.21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 warranted removal/suspension from membership. The disciplinary findings, accepted by the professional council after considering the member's representation, concluded that the member was guilty, and the reference remained uncontested due to absence of any reply. Applying the statutory power under s.21(6) (as applicable) and consistent with prior precedent emphasizing the profession's duty of integrity and ethical conduct as custodians of financial markets, the Court accepted the reference and directed suspension from membership for one year, with a restraint on rendering services as a chartered accountant during that period. - HC
Whether disciplinary "other misconduct" under s.22 read with s.21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 warranted removal/suspension from membership. The disciplinary findings, accepted by the professional council after considering the member's representation, concluded that the member was guilty, and the reference remained uncontested due to absence of any reply. Applying the statutory power under s.21(6) (as applicable) and consistent with prior precedent emphasizing the profession's duty of integrity and ethical conduct as custodians of financial markets, the Court accepted the reference and directed suspension from membership for one year, with a restraint on rendering services as a chartered accountant during that period. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.