Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In a second bail application arising from alleged GST fraud involving fake registrations and invoices to pass on ineligible ITC, the court examined the legality of arrest under s. 35(3) BNSS. The notice directed the accused to appear at 4:15 PM on a specified date, but the arrest memo recorded arrest at 11:45 AM on the same day; the investigating officer admitted a date error in the notice. Since the accused was arrested before the time fixed for appearance, there was no effective compliance with s. 35(3), rendering the arrest infirm. Consequently, bail was granted. - HC
In a second bail application arising from alleged GST fraud involving fake registrations and invoices to pass on ineligible ITC, the court examined the legality of arrest under s. 35(3) BNSS. The notice directed the accused to appear at 4:15 PM on a specified date, but the arrest memo recorded arrest at 11:45 AM on the same day; the investigating officer admitted a date error in the notice. Since the accused was arrested before the time fixed for appearance, there was no effective compliance with s. 35(3), rendering the arrest infirm. Consequently, bail was granted. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
