Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
On the characterisation of gains from sale of shares, the appellate authority accepted documentary evidence showing acquisition in tranches with verifiable dates and costs, and, after a remand report found no discrepancy, held the declared cost and holding period to be correct; the Revenue's plea that the evidence was not before the AO was rejected, and the relief allowing long-term capital loss/confirming short-term capital gain computation was sustained. On salary excess recovered under the Companies Act pursuant to Central Government directions, the recovery was held not to constitute taxable income, following binding precedent, and the addition was deleted. On addition under s.69A for alleged unexplained investment in a US property, the Revenue failed to link the investment to the assessee where family funds and corporate remittance were evidenced; deletion was upheld - ITAT
On the characterisation of gains from sale of shares, the appellate authority accepted documentary evidence showing acquisition in tranches with verifiable dates and costs, and, after a remand report found no discrepancy, held the declared cost and holding period to be correct; the Revenue's plea that the evidence was not before the AO was rejected, and the relief allowing long-term capital loss/confirming short-term capital gain computation was sustained. On salary excess recovered under the Companies Act pursuant to Central Government directions, the recovery was held not to constitute taxable income, following binding precedent, and the addition was deleted. On addition under s.69A for alleged unexplained investment in a US property, the Revenue failed to link the investment to the assessee where family funds and corporate remittance were evidenced; deletion was upheld - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
