Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
On the characterisation of gains from sale of shares, the appellate authority accepted documentary evidence showing acquisition in tranches with verifiable dates and costs, and, after a remand report found no discrepancy, held the declared cost and holding period to be correct; the Revenue's plea that the evidence was not before the AO was rejected, and the relief allowing long-term capital loss/confirming short-term capital gain computation was sustained. On salary excess recovered under the Companies Act pursuant to Central Government directions, the recovery was held not to constitute taxable income, following binding precedent, and the addition was deleted. On addition under s.69A for alleged unexplained investment in a US property, the Revenue failed to link the investment to the assessee where family funds and corporate remittance were evidenced; deletion was upheld - ITAT
On the characterisation of gains from sale of shares, the appellate authority accepted documentary evidence showing acquisition in tranches with verifiable dates and costs, and, after a remand report found no discrepancy, held the declared cost and holding period to be correct; the Revenue's plea that the evidence was not before the AO was rejected, and the relief allowing long-term capital loss/confirming short-term capital gain computation was sustained. On salary excess recovered under the Companies Act pursuant to Central Government directions, the recovery was held not to constitute taxable income, following binding precedent, and the addition was deleted. On addition under s.69A for alleged unexplained investment in a US property, the Revenue failed to link the investment to the assessee where family funds and corporate remittance were evidenced; deletion was upheld - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
