Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classificatio...
Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7081 to 7100 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Set-off of short-term capital loss against short-term capital gains taxable at different rates was governed by s.70(2), and in the absence of any statutory sequencing mandate, the taxpayer could first adjust losses against non-STT gains taxable at 30% and thereafter against STT-paid gains taxable at 15%; the Revenue's insistence on the reverse order impermissibly read a restriction into the statute, so the taxpayer's computation was accepted. Dividend on ADR/GDR held by a non-resident was covered by ss.115AC and 196D and had already suffered TDS; taxing it again and denying credit due to Form 26AS mismatch caused by third-party reporting failures violated ss.199 and 205, so the addition and denial of TDS credit were set aside. - ITAT
Set-off of short-term capital loss against short-term capital gains taxable at different rates was governed by s.70(2), and in the absence of any statutory sequencing mandate, the taxpayer could first adjust losses against non-STT gains taxable at 30% and thereafter against STT-paid gains taxable at 15%; the Revenue's insistence on the reverse order impermissibly read a restriction into the statute, so the taxpayer's computation was accepted. Dividend on ADR/GDR held by a non-resident was covered by ss.115AC and 196D and had already suffered TDS; taxing it again and denying credit due to Form 26AS mismatch caused by third-party reporting failures violated ss.199 and 205, so the addition and denial of TDS credit were set aside. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.