Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Set-off of short-term capital loss against short-term capital gains taxable at different rates was governed by s.70(2), and in the absence of any statutory sequencing mandate, the taxpayer could first adjust losses against non-STT gains taxable at 30% and thereafter against STT-paid gains taxable at 15%; the Revenue's insistence on the reverse order impermissibly read a restriction into the statute, so the taxpayer's computation was accepted. Dividend on ADR/GDR held by a non-resident was covered by ss.115AC and 196D and had already suffered TDS; taxing it again and denying credit due to Form 26AS mismatch caused by third-party reporting failures violated ss.199 and 205, so the addition and denial of TDS credit were set aside. - ITAT
Set-off of short-term capital loss against short-term capital gains taxable at different rates was governed by s.70(2), and in the absence of any statutory sequencing mandate, the taxpayer could first adjust losses against non-STT gains taxable at 30% and thereafter against STT-paid gains taxable at 15%; the Revenue's insistence on the reverse order impermissibly read a restriction into the statute, so the taxpayer's computation was accepted. Dividend on ADR/GDR held by a non-resident was covered by ss.115AC and 196D and had already suffered TDS; taxing it again and denying credit due to Form 26AS mismatch caused by third-party reporting failures violated ss.199 and 205, so the addition and denial of TDS credit were set aside. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.