Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Fraudulent trading under s.66(1) IBC was alleged based on suspected round-tripping and non-genuine purchase transactions reflected in the corporate debtor's books. The deciding authority held that absence of purchase invoices, transport/delivery proofs, and supporting payment trails constituted strong circumstantial evidence of sham trading and fund diversion, undermining the claim that payments were in the ordinary course of business. It further held that managing directors, given their control over day-to-day operations, could be held liable where allegations were specific and remained unrebutted, and no breach of natural justice arose as replies were filed and hearing granted. The direction to contribute to the corporate debtor's assets was upheld and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Fraudulent trading under s.66(1) IBC was alleged based on suspected round-tripping and non-genuine purchase transactions reflected in the corporate debtor's books. The deciding authority held that absence of purchase invoices, transport/delivery proofs, and supporting payment trails constituted strong circumstantial evidence of sham trading and fund diversion, undermining the claim that payments were in the ordinary course of business. It further held that managing directors, given their control over day-to-day operations, could be held liable where allegations were specific and remained unrebutted, and no breach of natural justice arose as replies were filed and hearing granted. The direction to contribute to the corporate debtor's assets was upheld and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
