Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Penalty under s. 271AAB(1A) was examined on whether the amount offered during search and assessed as unexplained money under s. 69A read with s. 115BBE qualified as "undisclosed income" under Explanation (c) to s. 271AAB. The definition requires income to be represented by money/bullion/jewellery/valuable article, or to be evidenced by entries or documents/transactions found during the s. 132 search. Since the quantum proceedings had already found that no incriminating material was recovered to support the addition, the statutory precondition failed, and the sum could not be treated as "undisclosed income"; the penalty was directed to be deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Penalty under s. 271AAB(1A) was examined on whether the amount offered during search and assessed as unexplained money under s. 69A read with s. 115BBE qualified as "undisclosed income" under Explanation (c) to s. 271AAB. The definition requires income to be represented by money/bullion/jewellery/valuable article, or to be evidenced by entries or documents/transactions found during the s. 132 search. Since the quantum proceedings had already found that no incriminating material was recovered to support the addition, the statutory precondition failed, and the sum could not be treated as "undisclosed income"; the penalty was directed to be deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
