Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Penalty under section 271AAB(1A) was examined on whether the addition made under section 69B read with section 115BBE qualified as "undisclosed income" under Explanation clause (c). The statutory definition mandates that such income must be evidenced by money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article/thing, or by entries/documents/transactions found during the search under section 132; thus, discovery of incriminating material in search is a mandatory precondition. As no incriminating material was found during search to support the addition of Rs. 28 lakhs, the amount did not fall within "undisclosed income," and the penalty could not be sustained; deletion of the penalty was directed and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Penalty under section 271AAB(1A) was examined on whether the addition made under section 69B read with section 115BBE qualified as "undisclosed income" under Explanation clause (c). The statutory definition mandates that such income must be evidenced by money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article/thing, or by entries/documents/transactions found during the search under section 132; thus, discovery of incriminating material in search is a mandatory precondition. As no incriminating material was found during search to support the addition of Rs. 28 lakhs, the amount did not fall within "undisclosed income," and the penalty could not be sustained; deletion of the penalty was directed and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
