Marketing support and subcontracted client contracts: no agency permanent establishment under Article 5 DTAA; arm's-length pricing bars profit attribu...
A deficiency memo issued in Form GST RFD-03 under Rule 90(3) rejecting a refund claim on the ground that no GST Council notification/circular existed on refund relating to GST paid on transfer of assignment rights was challenged. The Court held that such a ground could not sustain rejection at the deficiency memo stage and the refund application was required to be processed in accordance with law. Consequently, the deficiency memo was quashed, the refund application was revived, and the authorities were directed to pass a reasoned order on the refund claim within three weeks of receipt of the revived application. - HC
A deficiency memo issued in Form GST RFD-03 under Rule 90(3) rejecting a refund claim on the ground that no GST Council notification/circular existed on refund relating to GST paid on transfer of assignment rights was challenged. The Court held that such a ground could not sustain rejection at the deficiency memo stage and the refund application was required to be processed in accordance with law. Consequently, the deficiency memo was quashed, the refund application was revived, and the authorities were directed to pass a reasoned order on the refund claim within three weeks of receipt of the revived application. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
