Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
A deficiency memo issued in Form GST RFD-03 under Rule 90(3) rejecting a refund claim on the ground that no GST Council notification/circular existed on refund relating to GST paid on transfer of assignment rights was challenged. The Court held that such a ground could not sustain rejection at the deficiency memo stage and the refund application was required to be processed in accordance with law. Consequently, the deficiency memo was quashed, the refund application was revived, and the authorities were directed to pass a reasoned order on the refund claim within three weeks of receipt of the revived application. - HC
A deficiency memo issued in Form GST RFD-03 under Rule 90(3) rejecting a refund claim on the ground that no GST Council notification/circular existed on refund relating to GST paid on transfer of assignment rights was challenged. The Court held that such a ground could not sustain rejection at the deficiency memo stage and the refund application was required to be processed in accordance with law. Consequently, the deficiency memo was quashed, the refund application was revived, and the authorities were directed to pass a reasoned order on the refund claim within three weeks of receipt of the revived application. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
