Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Withdrawal of insolvency proceedings under Section 12A of the IBC at the liquidation stage was held impermissible because the statute confines Section 12A to the CIRP stage, and extending it into Chapter III would contradict legislative intent and distort the liquidation framework; accordingly, the application seeking withdrawal was rightly rejected. Invocation of inherent powers to bypass this express exclusion was disallowed since inherent powers cannot operate in a field expressly governed and consciously limited by Section 12A; hence, no interference with the impugned order was warranted. The plea to refer the matter to a larger Bench on alleged divergent co-ordinate views was rejected on the facts, and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Withdrawal of insolvency proceedings under Section 12A of the IBC at the liquidation stage was held impermissible because the statute confines Section 12A to the CIRP stage, and extending it into Chapter III would contradict legislative intent and distort the liquidation framework; accordingly, the application seeking withdrawal was rightly rejected. Invocation of inherent powers to bypass this express exclusion was disallowed since inherent powers cannot operate in a field expressly governed and consciously limited by Section 12A; hence, no interference with the impugned order was warranted. The plea to refer the matter to a larger Bench on alleged divergent co-ordinate views was rejected on the facts, and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
