Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Withdrawal of insolvency proceedings under Section 12A of the IBC at the liquidation stage was held impermissible because the statute confines Section 12A to the CIRP stage, and extending it into Chapter III would contradict legislative intent and distort the liquidation framework; accordingly, the application seeking withdrawal was rightly rejected. Invocation of inherent powers to bypass this express exclusion was disallowed since inherent powers cannot operate in a field expressly governed and consciously limited by Section 12A; hence, no interference with the impugned order was warranted. The plea to refer the matter to a larger Bench on alleged divergent co-ordinate views was rejected on the facts, and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Withdrawal of insolvency proceedings under Section 12A of the IBC at the liquidation stage was held impermissible because the statute confines Section 12A to the CIRP stage, and extending it into Chapter III would contradict legislative intent and distort the liquidation framework; accordingly, the application seeking withdrawal was rightly rejected. Invocation of inherent powers to bypass this express exclusion was disallowed since inherent powers cannot operate in a field expressly governed and consciously limited by Section 12A; hence, no interference with the impugned order was warranted. The plea to refer the matter to a larger Bench on alleged divergent co-ordinate views was rejected on the facts, and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.