Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Whether criminal proceedings under s.138 NI Act could be quashed at the threshold by examining if the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt was answered in the negative. Since the complaint averments disclosed the statutory ingredients of s.138, the court held that the quashing court must only test prima facie maintainability and cannot undertake a roving inquiry or appreciate evidence at the pre-trial stage. The statutory presumption under s.139 that the cheque was issued towards discharge of debt/liability operates unless rebutted by evidence at trial, and the issue is to be adjudicated in trial or later appellate/revisional scrutiny. The quashing order was set aside and the complaint and summoning order were restored for trial - SC
Whether criminal proceedings under s.138 NI Act could be quashed at the threshold by examining if the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt was answered in the negative. Since the complaint averments disclosed the statutory ingredients of s.138, the court held that the quashing court must only test prima facie maintainability and cannot undertake a roving inquiry or appreciate evidence at the pre-trial stage. The statutory presumption under s.139 that the cheque was issued towards discharge of debt/liability operates unless rebutted by evidence at trial, and the issue is to be adjudicated in trial or later appellate/revisional scrutiny. The quashing order was set aside and the complaint and summoning order were restored for trial - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
