Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Whether criminal proceedings under s.138 NI Act could be quashed at the threshold by examining if the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt was answered in the negative. Since the complaint averments disclosed the statutory ingredients of s.138, the court held that the quashing court must only test prima facie maintainability and cannot undertake a roving inquiry or appreciate evidence at the pre-trial stage. The statutory presumption under s.139 that the cheque was issued towards discharge of debt/liability operates unless rebutted by evidence at trial, and the issue is to be adjudicated in trial or later appellate/revisional scrutiny. The quashing order was set aside and the complaint and summoning order were restored for trial - SC
Whether criminal proceedings under s.138 NI Act could be quashed at the threshold by examining if the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt was answered in the negative. Since the complaint averments disclosed the statutory ingredients of s.138, the court held that the quashing court must only test prima facie maintainability and cannot undertake a roving inquiry or appreciate evidence at the pre-trial stage. The statutory presumption under s.139 that the cheque was issued towards discharge of debt/liability operates unless rebutted by evidence at trial, and the issue is to be adjudicated in trial or later appellate/revisional scrutiny. The quashing order was set aside and the complaint and summoning order were restored for trial - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
