Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Receipts from non-resident licensing of software to OEMs and under an operator agreement were examined to determine whether they constituted "royalty" under s. 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. It was held that the licence merely permitted use of a copyrighted article; no copyright or right to use copyright was transferred, and incidental downloading, installation, and backup did not amount to acquisition of copyright, hence the receipts were not royalty and were not chargeable as royalty income. Credit/refund of TDS was directed to be granted upon disposal of the pending rectification application. Interest under s. 234B was held consequential, and s. 234C chargeable only on returned income. - ITAT
Receipts from non-resident licensing of software to OEMs and under an operator agreement were examined to determine whether they constituted "royalty" under s. 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. It was held that the licence merely permitted use of a copyrighted article; no copyright or right to use copyright was transferred, and incidental downloading, installation, and backup did not amount to acquisition of copyright, hence the receipts were not royalty and were not chargeable as royalty income. Credit/refund of TDS was directed to be granted upon disposal of the pending rectification application. Interest under s. 234B was held consequential, and s. 234C chargeable only on returned income. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.