Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether a final assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with sections 144C(13) and 144B is subject to the outer limitation prescribed under sections 153(1) and 153(4). Relying on binding judicial precedents, it was held that the statutory upper time limit under section 153(1), as extended by section 153(4) where a transfer pricing reference is made, governs such final assessment orders, and any order passed beyond that period is time-barred and void. Since the impugned final assessment order was issued after expiry of the extended limitation period, it was quashed and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether a final assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with sections 144C(13) and 144B is subject to the outer limitation prescribed under sections 153(1) and 153(4). Relying on binding judicial precedents, it was held that the statutory upper time limit under section 153(1), as extended by section 153(4) where a transfer pricing reference is made, governs such final assessment orders, and any order passed beyond that period is time-barred and void. Since the impugned final assessment order was issued after expiry of the extended limitation period, it was quashed and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.