Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The dominant issue was whether the limitation for passing the final assessment order in a DRP case is governed by section 153(1) read with section 153(4) or by section 144C(13). Relying on coordinate bench precedent that followed HC rulings, the Tribunal held that statutory limitation must be computed under section 153(1) r/w section 153(4), fixing the last permissible date as 30.09.2021. Since the final assessment order was passed on 07.07.2023, it was held to be time-barred and was quashed, resulting in allowance of the taxpayer's appeal. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether the limitation for passing the final assessment order in a DRP case is governed by section 153(1) read with section 153(4) or by section 144C(13). Relying on coordinate bench precedent that followed HC rulings, the Tribunal held that statutory limitation must be computed under section 153(1) r/w section 153(4), fixing the last permissible date as 30.09.2021. Since the final assessment order was passed on 07.07.2023, it was held to be time-barred and was quashed, resulting in allowance of the taxpayer's appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.