Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
The dominant issue was whether the final assessment order under s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) was time-barred under s.153(1) read with s.153(4), including the effect of TOLA notifications on the limitation period. Following binding High Court precedents as applied in an earlier co-ordinate bench decision, limitation was computed strictly under s.153(1) r.w.s.153(4); for the relevant AY, the available extended time did not push the deadline beyond 30.09.2021, and an order passed in July 2022 was beyond time. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed as barred by limitation, with liberty to seek revival if the pending larger-bench ruling alters the legal position. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether the final assessment order under s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) was time-barred under s.153(1) read with s.153(4), including the effect of TOLA notifications on the limitation period. Following binding High Court precedents as applied in an earlier co-ordinate bench decision, limitation was computed strictly under s.153(1) r.w.s.153(4); for the relevant AY, the available extended time did not push the deadline beyond 30.09.2021, and an order passed in July 2022 was beyond time. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed as barred by limitation, with liberty to seek revival if the pending larger-bench ruling alters the legal position. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
