Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
The dominant issue was whether the final assessment order passed under s.143(3) read with s.144C(13) was time-barred under s.153(1) read with s.153(4), including the effect of TOLA notifications. Applying the rule of consistency and following an earlier co-ordinate bench decision, it was held that for AY 2018-19 the statutory time limit to complete assessment expired on 30.09.2021 and TOLA did not extend this period for that year. As the final order was passed after the limitation date, it was held to be barred by limitation and was quashed. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether the final assessment order passed under s.143(3) read with s.144C(13) was time-barred under s.153(1) read with s.153(4), including the effect of TOLA notifications. Applying the rule of consistency and following an earlier co-ordinate bench decision, it was held that for AY 2018-19 the statutory time limit to complete assessment expired on 30.09.2021 and TOLA did not extend this period for that year. As the final order was passed after the limitation date, it was held to be barred by limitation and was quashed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.