Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition under s.69 for alleged cash "on-money" paid over and above the agreement value for purchase of shop premises was examined on whether it could be sustained solely on third-party seized material and an employee's statement. In absence of any corroborative evidence linking the assessee to such payment, and where the assessee categorically denied any cash outflow, reliance on untested third-party material was held insufficient. Failure to confront the assessee with the seized material and denial of requested cross-examination vitiated the evidentiary basis. The addition was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee - ITAT
Addition under s.69 for alleged cash "on-money" paid over and above the agreement value for purchase of shop premises was examined on whether it could be sustained solely on third-party seized material and an employee's statement. In absence of any corroborative evidence linking the assessee to such payment, and where the assessee categorically denied any cash outflow, reliance on untested third-party material was held insufficient. Failure to confront the assessee with the seized material and denial of requested cross-examination vitiated the evidentiary basis. The addition was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.