CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Revocation of a customs broker licence, forfeiture of security deposit, and imposition of penalty were challenged on the ground that mandatory timelines under CBLR, 2018 were breached. The authority issued the show cause notice beyond 90 days from the offence report, submitted the enquiry report beyond 90 days from the show cause notice, and passed the final order beyond the stipulated period under Regulations 17(1), 17(5) and 17(7); these lapses rendered the proceedings and resultant order legally unsustainable, leading to quashing of the revocation, forfeiture, and penalty. The contention based on Circular No. 9/2010 was left open without adjudication. - HC
Revocation of a customs broker licence, forfeiture of security deposit, and imposition of penalty were challenged on the ground that mandatory timelines under CBLR, 2018 were breached. The authority issued the show cause notice beyond 90 days from the offence report, submitted the enquiry report beyond 90 days from the show cause notice, and passed the final order beyond the stipulated period under Regulations 17(1), 17(5) and 17(7); these lapses rendered the proceedings and resultant order legally unsustainable, leading to quashing of the revocation, forfeiture, and penalty. The contention based on Circular No. 9/2010 was left open without adjudication. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
