Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
Allegations of undervaluation and misdeclaration of imported LED TVs as unbranded were rejected because the panchnama showed brand stickers only on certain LED panels while other parts lacked branding, and branding of a component could not legally convert the entire TV into a branded product; hence rejection of declared value on this ground was unsustainable. Reliance on computer printouts/retrieved data was inadmissible as the mandatory conditions for electronic evidence under Section 138C were not complied with, leaving the allegations unproved; consequently, re-determination of value was set aside. For drywall screws, absence of contemporaneous examination and comparison with invoices from different financial years and unrelated parties rendered the valuation exercise presumptive; therefore, revaluation was quashed and the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT
Allegations of undervaluation and misdeclaration of imported LED TVs as unbranded were rejected because the panchnama showed brand stickers only on certain LED panels while other parts lacked branding, and branding of a component could not legally convert the entire TV into a branded product; hence rejection of declared value on this ground was unsustainable. Reliance on computer printouts/retrieved data was inadmissible as the mandatory conditions for electronic evidence under Section 138C were not complied with, leaving the allegations unproved; consequently, re-determination of value was set aside. For drywall screws, absence of contemporaneous examination and comparison with invoices from different financial years and unrelated parties rendered the valuation exercise presumptive; therefore, revaluation was quashed and the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
