Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Moratorium under Section 14 imposed on commencement of CIRP against the corporate debtor did not bar initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 95 against the personal guarantor, since Section 14 restricts recovery from the corporate debtor and does not preclude enforcement against a personal guarantor; invocation of the guarantee after CIRP was therefore valid, and admission of the Section 95 application was upheld. Section 10A was held inapplicable because it only restricts applications under Sections 7, 9 and 10 and does not prohibit proceedings against personal guarantors under Part III; consequently, the Section 95 proceedings were not inhibited. The admission order was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Moratorium under Section 14 imposed on commencement of CIRP against the corporate debtor did not bar initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 95 against the personal guarantor, since Section 14 restricts recovery from the corporate debtor and does not preclude enforcement against a personal guarantor; invocation of the guarantee after CIRP was therefore valid, and admission of the Section 95 application was upheld. Section 10A was held inapplicable because it only restricts applications under Sections 7, 9 and 10 and does not prohibit proceedings against personal guarantors under Part III; consequently, the Section 95 proceedings were not inhibited. The admission order was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
