Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Moratorium under Section 14 imposed on commencement of CIRP against the corporate debtor did not bar initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 95 against the personal guarantor, since Section 14 restricts recovery from the corporate debtor and does not preclude enforcement against a personal guarantor; invocation of the guarantee after CIRP was therefore valid, and admission of the Section 95 application was upheld. Section 10A was held inapplicable because it only restricts applications under Sections 7, 9 and 10 and does not prohibit proceedings against personal guarantors under Part III; consequently, the Section 95 proceedings were not inhibited. The admission order was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Moratorium under Section 14 imposed on commencement of CIRP against the corporate debtor did not bar initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 95 against the personal guarantor, since Section 14 restricts recovery from the corporate debtor and does not preclude enforcement against a personal guarantor; invocation of the guarantee after CIRP was therefore valid, and admission of the Section 95 application was upheld. Section 10A was held inapplicable because it only restricts applications under Sections 7, 9 and 10 and does not prohibit proceedings against personal guarantors under Part III; consequently, the Section 95 proceedings were not inhibited. The admission order was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.