Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Seized material receipt date u/s153C fixes "search date" for 10-year assessment block; AY 2012-13 excluded
    Challenge to anti-dumping investigation final findings: business impact fears not cause of action; writ dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    Late filing of customs duty order appeal after knowledge date: Section 128(1) time-limit breaches lead to dismissal
    Refund claim for excess additional customs duty: whether Section 27 needs formal reassessment; rejection set aside, refund restored
    Imported "MIKO-3" device classification dispute: electronic toys (CTH 95030030) vs data processing unit (CTH 84714190); reclassification rejected
    Imported EV eAxle reducer and bearings classification u/s XVII Notes/GIR 1: reducer under 8708; bearings under 8482
    Insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) import classification as "transistors" under tariff heading 8541 upheld, CTI 85412900 applied
    Clutch master and slave cylinders tariff classification: treated as motor vehicle clutch parts under CTI 87089300, confidentiality denied
    Clutch master and concentric slave cylinders: functional test under CTH 8412 leads to classification as vehicle parts CTH 8708
    Data projectors with HDMI/USB ports: whether still ADP-ready under tariff 85286200; classification upheld and exemption granted.
    Misconduct claims over counsel filing appeal on oral instructions dismissed; appeal struck for defects u/r 26(3)-(4).
    Family-owned company shareholding split dispute u/ss 241-242 ends with settlement, demand drafts exchanged, appeal closed
    Unregistered MoU-based possession of corporate debtor property challenged; Section 53A claim denied, eviction and usage charges upheld
    Gold inventory sold on unsecured credit during looming insolvency leads to directors' s66 IBC contribution for fraudulent trading
    Settlement after rejected IBC resolution plan: creditors approve enhanced payouts and CIRP costs; harsh impropriety remarks expunged
    Share allotment to non-resident paying for imported second-hand machinery: RBI approval upheld despite alleged FERA breach
    PMLA attachment of shell-company properties bought with NRHM-linked funds upheld u/s 5(1), appeals dismissed
    2262-day delay in filing statutory appeal amid COVID limitation exclusions, portal-monitoring expectations rejected; delay condoned.
    Single mortgage deed securing four separate loans: stamp duty assessed u/s 5, not Section 4; petition dismissed.
    Joint s.138 cheque-bounce complaint for two cheques to different payees split; second payee case quashed, first continues
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

In an appeal by a convicted director/authorised signatory under...

Cheque dishonour conviction of company director: whether Section 148 requires 20% appellate deposit when company can't be tried; deposit quashed

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Indian Laws December 22, 2025 Case Laws SC
In an appeal by a convicted director/authorised signatory under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act where the company could not be proceeded against due to a legal impediment, the Court examined whether an appellate deposit under Section 148 can be directed against such individual. It held that the appellate court must not impose the 20% deposit mechanically and must consider exceptional circumstances, including that the appellant may not be the "drawer"; accordingly, the condition directing deposit was quashed and suspension of sentence was restored on bond. However, noting conflicting interpretations on whether Section 148 is confined to the juristic drawer in all such scenarios, the question was referred for decision by a Larger Bench. - SC

Topics

Acts Income Tax