Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Additions for cash receipts found during survey were unsustainable where the impugned receipts related to land owned and sold by a partnership firm, the advances were recorded in the firm's books as advances for sale of flats, and the firm had offered the corresponding income to tax; absent contrary evidence showing the transactions belonged to the individual taxpayer, the addition as the taxpayer's income was deleted. Additions based on impounded documents recording transactions in the taxpayer's name were likewise deleted because, on identical facts, the transactions were held to pertain to the partnership firm and to be accounted for as advances in the firm's books, rendering assessment in the taxpayer's hands impermissible. - ITAT
Additions for cash receipts found during survey were unsustainable where the impugned receipts related to land owned and sold by a partnership firm, the advances were recorded in the firm's books as advances for sale of flats, and the firm had offered the corresponding income to tax; absent contrary evidence showing the transactions belonged to the individual taxpayer, the addition as the taxpayer's income was deleted. Additions based on impounded documents recording transactions in the taxpayer's name were likewise deleted because, on identical facts, the transactions were held to pertain to the partnership firm and to be accounted for as advances in the firm's books, rendering assessment in the taxpayer's hands impermissible. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.