Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
The dominant issue was whether the auction purchase funded through a purported loan constituted a benami transaction under the 1988 Act. The Tribunal held that routing consideration through banking channels did not rebut benami character where neither the purchasers nor the lender had demonstrated creditworthiness, and the lender's capacity to advance the huge loan was unsupported by its turnover and partners' knowledge. With no pleaded or proved legitimate source of funds, the consideration and beneficial ownership were treated as unknown, attracting s. 2(9)(D), to which the exception under s. 2(9)(A) was held inapplicable. Consequently, the provisional attachment was upheld and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
The dominant issue was whether the auction purchase funded through a purported loan constituted a benami transaction under the 1988 Act. The Tribunal held that routing consideration through banking channels did not rebut benami character where neither the purchasers nor the lender had demonstrated creditworthiness, and the lender's capacity to advance the huge loan was unsupported by its turnover and partners' knowledge. With no pleaded or proved legitimate source of funds, the consideration and beneficial ownership were treated as unknown, attracting s. 2(9)(D), to which the exception under s. 2(9)(A) was held inapplicable. Consequently, the provisional attachment was upheld and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
