Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
IBBI's locus standi to maintain a review petition was upheld because the IBC empowers it to regulate insolvency professionals and to entertain complaints, investigate, and initiate disciplinary action regarding their conduct; hence it could seek review of an order impacting liquidation administration. However, review was refused as the liquidation sale process was conducted under the statutory framework, guided by decisions of the stakeholders' consultation committee and supervised through orders of the adjudicating authority, with no contemporaneous objection or finding of wrongdoing by the SCC, NCLT or NCLAT; allegations of suppression and fraud were also found unsupported since relevant auction and disciplinary materials were already on record. The review petition was dismissed. - HC
IBBI's locus standi to maintain a review petition was upheld because the IBC empowers it to regulate insolvency professionals and to entertain complaints, investigate, and initiate disciplinary action regarding their conduct; hence it could seek review of an order impacting liquidation administration. However, review was refused as the liquidation sale process was conducted under the statutory framework, guided by decisions of the stakeholders' consultation committee and supervised through orders of the adjudicating authority, with no contemporaneous objection or finding of wrongdoing by the SCC, NCLT or NCLAT; allegations of suppression and fraud were also found unsupported since relevant auction and disciplinary materials were already on record. The review petition was dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
