Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Receipt of foreign currency through a non-banking channel was admitted to have accrued on 16.07.2007 and not repatriated/surrendered within 180 days, constituting contravention of Section 3(a) and Section 4 of the Act of 1999 and Section 8 read with Regulations 3 and 7 of the 2000 Regulations; the penalty was therefore sustained but reduced proportionately considering the amount involved in Singapore Dollars, with adjustment of any pre-deposit. Separately, confiscation of the seized cash was set aside because there was no finding that the cash was used or involved in any hawala transaction or other contravention, and mere possession without nexus to a violation did not justify confiscation. - AT
Receipt of foreign currency through a non-banking channel was admitted to have accrued on 16.07.2007 and not repatriated/surrendered within 180 days, constituting contravention of Section 3(a) and Section 4 of the Act of 1999 and Section 8 read with Regulations 3 and 7 of the 2000 Regulations; the penalty was therefore sustained but reduced proportionately considering the amount involved in Singapore Dollars, with adjustment of any pre-deposit. Separately, confiscation of the seized cash was set aside because there was no finding that the cash was used or involved in any hawala transaction or other contravention, and mere possession without nexus to a violation did not justify confiscation. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
