Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years in a single composite show-cause notice under s.73/s.74 of the CGST/KGST Act was held impermissible because the statutory scheme treats each financial year as an independent assessment unit with separate returns, reconciliation, evaluation of transactions/ITC, and year-specific limitation; the Act does not contemplate consolidated proceedings, rendering such notices without jurisdiction. Consequently, the composite show-cause notice covering FY 2019-20 to 2023-24 and all consequential proceedings were quashed, with liberty reserved to initiate fresh action in accordance with law. - HC
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years in a single composite show-cause notice under s.73/s.74 of the CGST/KGST Act was held impermissible because the statutory scheme treats each financial year as an independent assessment unit with separate returns, reconciliation, evaluation of transactions/ITC, and year-specific limitation; the Act does not contemplate consolidated proceedings, rendering such notices without jurisdiction. Consequently, the composite show-cause notice covering FY 2019-20 to 2023-24 and all consequential proceedings were quashed, with liberty reserved to initiate fresh action in accordance with law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
