Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
Excess recovery was alleged where the tax department adjusted refund amounts, including a 10% pre-deposit, towards disputed demand, resulting in collection beyond the 20% ceiling prescribed by administrative instructions. The court held that the taxpayer's representation seeking correction and refund required consideration on merits and directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks; it further ordered that any amount recovered in excess of 20% of the disputed demand be refunded. - HC
Excess recovery was alleged where the tax department adjusted refund amounts, including a 10% pre-deposit, towards disputed demand, resulting in collection beyond the 20% ceiling prescribed by administrative instructions. The court held that the taxpayer's representation seeking correction and refund required consideration on merits and directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks; it further ordered that any amount recovered in excess of 20% of the disputed demand be refunded. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
