Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7281 to 7300 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Excess recovery was alleged where the tax department adjusted refund amounts, including a 10% pre-deposit, towards disputed demand, resulting in collection beyond the 20% ceiling prescribed by administrative instructions. The court held that the taxpayer's representation seeking correction and refund required consideration on merits and directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks; it further ordered that any amount recovered in excess of 20% of the disputed demand be refunded. - HC
Excess recovery was alleged where the tax department adjusted refund amounts, including a 10% pre-deposit, towards disputed demand, resulting in collection beyond the 20% ceiling prescribed by administrative instructions. The court held that the taxpayer's representation seeking correction and refund required consideration on merits and directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks; it further ordered that any amount recovered in excess of 20% of the disputed demand be refunded. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
